Serum trough concentration threshold and risk factors of cefoperazone-induced coagulopathy in critically ill patients: A retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the risk factors influencing the development of cefoperazone-induced coagulopathy in critically ill patients and determine the threshold of serum trough concentration. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in the intensive care unit patients treated with cefoperazone, and it was approved by the Ethical Committee of Drum Tower Hospital affiliated with the Medical School of Nanjing University (NO.2023-158-01). Patients were divided into the normal group and coagulopathy group based on prothrombin time. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were compared using univariate analysis. The serum concentration threshold and influencing factors of cefoperazone-induced coagulopathy in critically ill patients were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curve and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included, and cefoperazone-induced coagulopathy occurred in 39 patients, with an incidence of 34.5%. These patients experienced significant prothrombin time prolongation around day 6 (median) after cefoperazone application. The serum trough concentration threshold of cefoperazone-induced coagulopathy in critically ill patients was 87.765 mg/l. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the APACHE II score (p = 0.034), prophylactic use of vitamin K1 (p < 0.001), hepatic impairment (p = 0.014), and Cmin ≥ 87.765 mg/l (p = 0.005) were associated with cefoperazone-induced coagulopathy. CONCLUSION: Cefoperazone-induced coagulopathy usually occurs on the 6th day of cefoperazone use in critically ill patients. The risk will increase in patients with an APACHE II score > 25, hepatic impairment, and cefoperazone Cmin ≥ 87.765 mg/l. Vitamin K1 is effective in preventing this adverse reaction.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia in Hospitalized adult patients.

Cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia is associated with longer hospital stays and increased risk of death. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the occurrence of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia in hospitalized adult patients. This retrospective cohort study involved hospitalized adult patients at Xi'an Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 based on the Chinese pharmacovigilance system developed and established by the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center in China. Independent predictors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia were obtained using multivariate logistic regression and were used to develop and establish the nomogram. According to the same standard, the clinical data of hospitalized patients using cefoperazone/sulbactam at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University from January 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 were collected as the external validation group. The 893 hospitalized patients included 95 who were diagnosed with cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia. Our study enrolled 610 patients: 427 in the training group and 183 in the internal validation group. The independent predictors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia were surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 5.279, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.597-10.729), baseline platelet count ≤50×109/L (OR = 2.492, 95% CI = 1.110-5.593), baseline hepatic dysfunction (OR = 12.362, 95% CI = 3.277-46.635), cumulative defined daily doses (OR = 1.162, 95% CI = 1.162-1.221) and nutritional risk (OR = 16.973, 95% CI = 7.339-39.254). The areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic for the training and internal validation groups were 0.909 (95% CI = 0.875-0.943) and 0.888 (95% CI = 0.832-0.944), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow tests yielded p = 0.475 and p = 0.742 for the training and internal validation groups, respectively, confirming the goodness of fit of the nomogram model. In the external validation group (n = 221), the nomogram was equally robust in cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia (AUC = 0.837, 95%CI = 0.736-0.938). The nomogram model constructed in this study had good predictive performance and extrapolation, which can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia early. This will be useful in preventing the occurrence of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia and allowing timely intervention measures to be performed.

Safety of Tigecycline in Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of the study were to investigate the risk factors of tigecycline-induced hypofibrinogenemia and to evaluate the safety of tigecycline with concomitant antithrombotic drugs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who received tigecycline for more than 3 days between January 2015 and June 2019. Clinical and laboratory data were collected including fibrinogen concertation, tigecycline dose, duration of treatment, disease severity, complete blood count, indicators of infection, liver and renal function. Risk factors of hypofibrinogenemia were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. To evaluate the safety of tigecycline and concomitant antithrombotic drugs, bleeding events were assessed by comparing the decline in hemoglobin and the amount of red blood cell transfusion in patients with antithrombotic drugs and those without. RESULTS: This study included a total of 68 cases, 20 of which experienced hypofibrinogenemia while receiving tigecycline treatment. Duration of treatment, cefoperazone/sulbactam combination therapy, and fibrinogen levels prior to initiation of tigecycline were risk factors associated with tigecycline-induced hypofibrinogenemia. There were 26 recorded bleeding incidents, 25 of which happened before the start of tigecycline. Antithrombotic and non-antithrombotic patients did not differ in their hemoglobin decline or need for red blood cell transfusions while taking tigecycline. CONCLUSION: A longer treatment duration, cefoperazone/sulbactam combination therapy, and a lower level of fibrinogen before tigecycline were associated with an increased risk of tigecycline-induced hypofibrinogenemia. A combination of antithrombotic drugs and tigecycline did not aggravate the bleeding events during tigecycline treatment.

Effect of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam on Blood Coagulation Function in Infected Emergency Department Patients and the Necessity of Vitamin K1 (VK1) Preventive Intervention: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND Owing to its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, strong antibacterial effects, and ß-lactamase stability, cefoperazone/sulbactam has been recognized as a first-line empirical drug for treating severe infections. However, its administration is also characterized by numerous adverse effects, including coagulation dysfunction. Here, we summarize past clinical treatment data to provide data support for clinical use of cefoperazone sulbactam. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical medical records of 820 patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam from January 2015 to December 2020. A retrospective cohort study design was used. We assessed the general data of patients, age and sex distribution, type of primary disease, and incidence and days of abnormal blood coagulation with cefoperazone sulbactam. The chi-square test and t test were used to analyze the effect of cefoperazone sulbactam on coagulation function and the effect of vitamin K intervention on prognosis. RESULTS The rate of coagulation dysfunction was 24.39% (200 patients). Among these 200 patients, 50 were treated with vitamin K1. With increasing patient age, the number of patients with cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced coagulation dysfunction increased (peak at 81-90 years). APACHE II of coagulation dysfunction (15.54±4.095) was significantly higher than that in the normal group. It occurred at days 2-19 after administration of 9.0 g/day of cefoperazone/sulbactam. Measured coagulation indices were significantly higher after treatment with cefoperazone/sulbactam than before treatment, including international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, and activated partial thrombin time (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS All coagulation indices decreased significantly after vitamin K1 intervention, indicating improved coagulation function, especially in patients with high APACHE II scores. Hence, regulated vitamin K1 administration can benefit patients with coagulation dysfunction in clinical treatment.

Cross-reactivity between piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam in drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia.

Beta-lactam antibiotics commonly cause immune thrombocytopenia. Cross-reactivity in patients with drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia has rarely been reported. In this study, we describe the case of a 79-year-old man who developed thrombocytopenia after receiving piperacillin-tazobactam for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and he was successfully treated with meropenem and cefotiam. However, thrombocytopenia recurred after cefoperazone-sulbactam administration. This indicated that cross-reactivity of platelet-specific antibodies occurred between piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam. However, the responsible drug structures remain unknown, requiring further investigation. Likewise, chemical structure similarities among beta-lactam antibiotics must be examined to determine the risk of immune thrombocytopenia in the clinical setting.

Cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hemolytic anemia.

Drug-induced hemolytic anemia (DIHA) is a rare complication of drug therapy and usually underdiagnosed. Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a compound prepared from the third generation of cephalosporin and ß-lactamase inhibitor. There are limited data of DIHA induced from cefoperazone/sulbactam. A 93-year-old female patient, who had an operation on the biliary tract 3 months ago, was admitted to our hospital with an abdominal infection. After cefoperazone/sulbactam was given as anti-infection treatment, the patient developed hemolytic anemia on the third day. Cefoperazone/sulbactam was discontinued and replaced with meropenem. Subsequently the level of red blood cells, hemoglobin, and hematocrit returned to normal. Clinicians should pay attention to monitoring the possible adverse reactions during the use of cefoperazone/sulbactam and should be aware of the occurrence of DIHA, so as to give timely treatment.

The Investigation on Nosocomial Infection of Acinetobacter baumannii and the Clinical Analysis of Sequential Therapy of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Sodium for Intracranial Infection.

Background: Intracranial infection is a serious complication after neurosurgery. According to a survey, the incidence of intracranial infection is about 2.2%-2.6%, and patients with severe symptoms may even pose a threat to their life safety. Objective: To explore the risk factors for intracranial infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii after surgery and the clinical effect of sequential therapy of cefoperazone/sulbactam sodium. Methods: In this study, a retrospective study was used. In this case-control study, 48 cases of intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection after neurosurgery in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2021 were selected as the infection group, and 96 patients without intracranial infection after surgery during the same period were selected as the control group to study all kinds of related factors and analyze the risk factors for intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection; in addition, in accordance with the therapeutic regimen for anti-infection, the infection group was divided into the tigecycline group (patients with tigecycline therapy in this group) and the combined group (patients with tigecycline combined with cefoperazone/sulbactam sequential therapy), with 24 cases in each group in order to compare the therapeutic effects of the two groups. Results: Logistic regression factor model results show that increasing age of patients, surgical treatment for intracranial tumor or craniocerebral trauma, postoperative drainage time (≥3 days), and postoperative hospital stay (≥10 days) were the risk factors for postoperative intracranial infection of Acinetobacter baumannii in neurosurgical patients (P < 0.05), and postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment can reduce the incidence of intracranial infection (P < 0.05). The cerebrospinal fluid nucleated cell count, serum CRP, and serum PCT in the combined group 72 h after treatment were lower than those in the tigecycline group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with the clinical efficacy after 72-hour treatment, the cure rate and effective rate in the combined treatment group were 83.33% and 16.67%, respectively, and those in the tigecycline group were 54.17% and 33.33%, respectively. The invalid interest rate was 12.50%, and the combined treatment group was superior to the tigecycline group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with craniocerebral surgery, targeted preventive interventions should be carried out for the risk factors that may lead to intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection. The clinical effect of tigecycline combined with cefoperazone and sulbactam sodium sequentially in the treatment of intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection is better.

A comparative study of the effects of different fucoidans on cefoperazone-induced gut microbiota disturbance and intestinal inflammation.

Antibiotic abuse can lead to gut microbiota disturbance and intestinal inflammation, which in turn may lead to serious inflammatory bowel disease and metabolic syndromes. To investigate the effect of fucoidan on alleviation of the side effects of antibiotics and its structure-activity relationship, we compared the effects of two fucoidan fractions with medium and low molecular weights (MF and LF) from Laminaria japonica on microbiota dysbiosis, colonic inflammation and intestinal mucosal damage in a cefoperazone-induced intestinal injury mouse model. Our results showed that oral administration of 200 mg kg-1 LF (Mw = 1.13 kDa) and MF (Mw = 26.7 kDa) together with 100 mg kg-1 cefoperazone for 10 days could significantly alleviate weight loss, colon shortening and enlargement, mucosal structural damage in the small intestine, cecum and colon induced by cefoperazone in mice. Meanwhile, LF and MF also significantly suppressed the overproduction of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6 in the colon; however, LF can restore the decrease in the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the small intestine and the decrease in the levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6 in the cecum induced by cefoperazone in mice. We found that the molecular weight of fucoidan plays an important role in the regulation of the gut microbiota in antibiotic-treated mice. Interestingly, fucoidans with different molecular weights resulted in quite different caecal microbiota communities. MF exhibited a much better effect on the restoration of the gut microbiota community richness and diversity and the beneficial bacterium Muribaculaceae. However, LF resulted in the dominance of bacteria including Staphylococcus in cefoperazone treated mice, without an increase in the community richness and diversity of caecal microbiota. In the LF and MF treated mice, an increase in the abundance of beneficial bacteria, Muribaculaceae, Acinetobacter_lwoffii and Alloprevotella, and a decrease in the abundance of harmful bacteria, e.g., Parasutterella, Helicobacter and Enterococcus were also observed. Considering the negative effect of LF on the gut microbiota, MF with a molecular weight of 26.7 kDa seemed to be a more suitable choice of prebiotics for patients receiving cefoperazone treatment.

Comparison of antibiotic-associated diarrhea caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam in neurosurgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence and prognosis of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) between patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam in the neurosurgery department. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who received cefoperazone/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam to prevent or treat hospital-acquired infections in the Department of Neurosurgery of The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital between October 2019 and October 2020. For patients with AAD, clinical data, antibiotic usage, the incidence of diarrhea, treatment, and prognosis were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 356 patients were enrolled, and 65 (18.6%) experienced AAD, 38 patients in the cefoperazone/sulbactam group and 27 patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. The AAD rate did not differ between the treatment arms. Conversely, the dosage, intensity, and duration of antibiotic therapy differed between the groups, whereas no differences were noted in the time to the appearance of diarrhea and prognosis. According to regression analysis, the incidence of AAD did not differ between the groups (odds ratio [OR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46-1.48). CONCLUSION: Cefoperazone/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam can lead to a similar incidence rate of AAD. The combined application of antibiotics and empiric therapy often occurs. The rational use of antibiotics should be improved.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam in Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam against alternative antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and CKNI databases were searched for relevant articles up to November 25, 2020. The primary outcome was clinical efficacy rate, and the secondary outcomes were microbiologic eradication rate, mortality rate, and adverse event (AE) risk. Results: Twelve studies involving 1,674 patients were included. Overall, the clinical efficacy rate of cefoperazone-sulbactam and comparators was 87.7% and 81.7%, respectively, and cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a higher clinical efficacy rate than that the comparator (odds ratio [OR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.00; I2 = 36%). Additionally, cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a lower clinical failure rate (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.28-0.57; I2 = 0) and a higher clinical cure rate (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.17-2.03; I2 = 0) than the comparators. Cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a higher microbiologic eradication rate than the comparator (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.72-3.76; I2 = 0). Finally, there was no significant difference between cefoperazone-sulbactam and the comparators in terms of mortality rate (OR 090; 95% CI 0.38-2.16; I2 = 0) and AE risk (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.74-1.55; I2 = 0). Conclusions: The clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam were similar to those of alternative antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Therefore, cefoperazone-sulbactam could be recommended as an effective and safe antibiotic for treating intra-abdominal infections.

A case report of rash induced by cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium plus metronidazole sodium chloride combined with morphine hydrochloride.

We report a case of rashes in a patient undergoing cesarean section. She was administered cefoperazone and sulbactam sodium + metronidazole sodium chloride combined with morphine hydrochloride perioperatively, which caused a rash as an adverse side effect. The patient, 35 years old, underwent lower uterine segment cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. She received intravenous infusion of cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium + metronidazole sodium chloride for anti-infection therapy before operation and morphine hydrochloride for analgesia at the end of the operation. The patient later experienced skin itching and had rashes on the waist, abdomen, and back. According to the patient's physical signs, the correlation with drug injection time, and the adverse side effects reported in the drug instructions and related literature, the adverse side effect may have been caused by cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium, metronidazole sodium chloride, and morphine hydrochloride. The drugs were suspended, and the patient was given anti-allergic treatment. After that, the above symptoms subsided. Therefore, we suspect that cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium, metronidazole sodium chloride, or morphine hydrochloride injection, or a combination of two or more of these drugs, caused the adverse side effect of skin rash in the patient. This study reports a case of adverse side effects of skin itching and rash after the use of cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium, metronidazole sodium chloride, and morphine hydrochloride in a pregnant woman undergoing cesarean section. The occurrence of adverse side effects in special populations should attract clinicians' attention. When giving such drugs, medical personnel should take a full history the patient's allergy and closely monitor the occurrence of adverse side effects in the early stages of medication.

The effect of cefoperazone sulbactam and piperacillin tazobactam on mortality in Gram-negative nosocomial infections.

Cefoperazone-sulbactam (CS) and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) are used in the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial infections (NIs). We aimed to compare the effects of these two antibiotics on mortality and treatment success. Patients treated with CS or TZP empirically for at least three days with suspicion of NI were included in this retrospective study. In total, 308 (154 patients in both treatment arms) patients were analyzed. Treatment success rate in CS and TZP group respectively (50% vs 51.2%, p = 0.18), 28-day mortality rate (46.1% vs 42.8%, p = 0.56) and antibiotic-related side effects (50.6% vs 46.1%, p = 0.42) were similar except prolonged prothrombin time (19.4% vs 6.4%; p = 0.001). According to this study results, CS and TZP have equal effectivity and safety for the empirical treatment of Gram-negative NIs. CS may be an appropriate alternative to TZP for antibiotic cycling or mixing strategy to reduce antibiotic resistance.

Cefoperazone-sulbactam and risk of coagulation disorders or bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Limited evidence has suggested that cefoperazone-sulbactam causes coagulation disorders and bleeding.Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study to compare patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam versus those treated with cefoperazone-tazobactam or ceftazidime. Propensity-score matching was used to explore whether treatment with cefoperazone-sulbactam increased the risk of prothrombin time (PT) prolongation, coagulation disorders, and bleeding, or decreased platelets (PLT).Results: The cohort included 23,242 patients. Among patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam, the risk of PT prolongation, coagulation disorders, decreased PLT, and bleeding was 5.3%, 9.2%, 15.7%, and 4.2%, respectively. Propensity-score matching analyses suggested that cefoperazone-sulbactam increased the risk of PT prolongation (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.61-3.18), coagulation disorders (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.43-2.30), and decreased PLT (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.25-1.72), but not increase bleeding (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.40) compared with ceftazidime. Patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam had higher risk of PT prolongation (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.11-2.10), coagulation disorders (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.21-1.95), but not decreased PLT (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.07) or bleeding (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.42), compared with those receiving cefoperazone-tazobactam.Conclusion: Cefoperazone-sulbactam may be associated with a higher risk of PT prolongation and coagulation disorders compared with cefoperazone-tazobactam and ceftazidime.

Microbiota of MR1 deficient mice confer resistance against Clostridium difficile infection.

Clostridium difficile (Cd) infection (CDI) typically occurs after antibiotic usage perturbs the gut microbiota. Mucosa-associated invariant T cells (MAIT) are found in the gut and their development is dependent on Major histocompatibility complex-related protein 1 (MR1) and the host microbiome. Here we were interested in determining whether the absence of MR1 impacts resistance to CDI. To this end, wild-type (WT) and MR1-/- mice were treated with antibiotics and then infected with Cd spores. Surprisingly, MR1-/- mice exhibited resistance to Cd colonization. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of feces revealed inherent differences in microbial composition. This colonization resistance was transferred from MR1-/- to WT mice via fecal microbiota transplantation, suggesting that MR1-dependent factors influence the microbiota, leading to CDI susceptibility.

Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans.

Candida albicans is the fourth most common cause of systemic nosocomial infections, posing a significant risk in immunocompromised individuals. As the majority of systemic C. albicans infections stem from endogenous gastrointestinal (GI) colonization, understanding the mechanisms associated with GI colonization is essential in the development of novel methods to prevent C. albicans-related mortality. In this study, we investigated the role of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) including acetate, butyrate, and propionate on growth, morphogenesis, and GI colonization of C. albicans. Our results indicate that cefoperazone-treated mice susceptible to C. albicans infection had significantly decreased levels of SCFAs in the cecal contents that correlate with a higher fungal load in the feces. Further, using in vivo concentration of SCFAs, we demonstrated that SCFAs inhibit the growth, germ tube, hyphae and biofilm development of C. albicans in vitro. Collectively, results from this study suggest that antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of SCFAs in the cecum enhances the growth and GI colonization of C. albicans.

Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Cefepime in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia.

Cefoperazone, a third-generation cephamycin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and the ability to permeate bacterial cell membranes, is active against commonly encountered multidrug-resistant pathogens for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP). To clarify the clinical effects of cefoperazone-sulbactam in the treatment of HAP and HCAP, we conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial that recruited patients aged ≥18 years suffering HAP/HCAP. Participants were randomly assigned to the cefoperazone-sulbactam (2 g of each per 12 h) or cefepime (2 g per 12 h) arm. Clinical and microbiological responses were evaluated at early posttherapy and test-of-cure visits. Recruited patients were allocated to subpopulations for intent-to-treat (n = 154), per-protocol (n = 147), and safety (n = 166) analyses. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that (i) at the early posttherapy visit, 87.3% of patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam and 84.3% of patients receiving cefepime achieved clinical improvement or cure (risk difference of 3.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.0% to 15.0%), and (ii) at the test-of-cure visit, 73.1% of patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam and 56.8% of patients receiving cefepime were assessed as cured (risk difference of 16.3%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 33.0%). These results indicated the noninferiority of cefoperazone-sulbactam to cefepime, which was confirmed by per-protocol analysis. The chest radiographic consolidation/infiltration resolution rate, microbiological eradiation rate, and percentage of adverse events were comparable in both groups. Serious adverse events were rare, and none was judged to be related to the study drugs. Cefoperazone-sulbactam at 2 g every 12 h was noninferior to cefepime at 2 g every 2 h for patients with HCAP.

Antibiotic-induced alterations in taurocholic acid levels promote gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans.

Candida albicans is a fungal pathogen that poses a significant public health risk due to high incidence and mortality rates among immunocompromised patients. Candida albicans infections begin with successful gastrointestinal (GI) colonization; however, the mechanisms behind this colonization remain to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the role of taurocholic acid (TCA) on growth and GI colonization of C. albicans. Our results indicate that cefoperazone-treated mice susceptible to C. albicans infection had significantly increased levels of TCA in the gut contents. In addition, an increase in TCA levels directly correlates with higher C. albicans load in the fecal and gut contents of antibiotic-treated infected mice. Using in vitro assays, we also demonstrated that TCA enhances the growth of C. albicans and its ability to develop filamentous hyphae. Furthermore, TCA significantly increased the ability of C. albicans to attach to mammalian cells. These results demonstrate that antibiotic treatment alters TCA levels in the gut and potentially enhances GI colonization of C. albicans.

Cefepime vs. cefoperazone/sulbactam in combination with amikacin as empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia.

PURPOSE: Beta lactams are standard empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia (FN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime monotherapy compared with cefoperazone/sulbactam plus amikacin (CS + A) for empirical treatment of high risk FN. METHODS: One hundred seventy-five patients with 336 FN episodes were randomized to receive either cefepime (2 g q8h for adults and 50 mg/kg q8h for children) or CS (2 g q8h for adults and 50 mg/kg q8h for children) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg once a day). Positive response was defined as afebrile within 72 h of starting antibiotics, persistent afebrile status more than 48 h and no requirement of second-line antibiotics and antifungal agents. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-six episodes were assessable for efficacy (168 cefepime, 168 CS + A). The positive response to antibiotics was identical for cefepime (53%) and CS + A (53%). Positive response was similar in MDI (microbiologically documented infection), 50 vs. 35% (p = 0.248), CDI (clinically documented infection), 50 vs. 35% (p = 0.259), combination CDI + MDI, 25 vs. 15% (p = 0.400), FUO (fever of unknown origin), 68 vs. 72% (p = 0.577) respectively in the two groups. The successful discontinuation of antibiotics at 72 h in FUO was similar in both groups (60 vs. 59%, p = 0.544). Total drug-related adverse events were similar in both groups (8 vs. 6%) except renal dysfunction was high in CS + A (1 vs. 7 events). Mortality was the same between two groups (8 vs 7%). CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime monotherapy and CS + A had similar efficacy as first-line therapy for FN. Discontinuation of empirical antibiotics is safe and feasible approach in selected group of FUO patients.

Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis caused by cefoperazone and sodium sulbactam

Abstract Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis is a localized variant of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, which is characterized by the eruption of multiple scattered pustules following drug administration. A 72-year-old woman presented with multiple erythematous pustules on her face, which had appeared two days after using cefoperazone and sodium sulbactam. Histopathological findings showed subcorneal pustules and mixed inflammatory cell infiltration in the dermis. The pustules resolved within about two weeks after the patient discontinued the antibiotics. This report discusses the case of a woman with a cutaneous drug reaction consistent with acute localized exanthematous pustulosis that occurred after cefoperazone and sodium sulbactam were administered.